Which statement correctly defines repeatability and accuracy?

Prepare for the Industrial Robotics Exam with our detailed quizzes. Utilize flashcards, multiple-choice questions, and comprehensive explanations to ensure exam readiness. Master the key concepts and expect success!

Multiple Choice

Which statement correctly defines repeatability and accuracy?

Explanation:
The key idea here is understanding how repeatability and accuracy differ in robot positioning. Repeatability is about consistency: when you command the robot to move to the same pose multiple times, how tightly do the results cluster? It reflects the spread of repeated measurements—the smaller the spread, the higher the repeatability. Accuracy, on the other hand, is about closeness to the true target: it’s the bias between the average pose you achieve and the actual desired position or orientation. So the best description is that repeatability is the ability to return to the same pose consistently, while accuracy is how close that pose is to the true target. If the robot lands in nearly the same place every time but that place isn’t the target, it’s highly repeatable but not very accurate. The other statements mix up these ideas, either swapping the definitions, claiming they’re the same, or conflating average error with dispersion.

The key idea here is understanding how repeatability and accuracy differ in robot positioning. Repeatability is about consistency: when you command the robot to move to the same pose multiple times, how tightly do the results cluster? It reflects the spread of repeated measurements—the smaller the spread, the higher the repeatability. Accuracy, on the other hand, is about closeness to the true target: it’s the bias between the average pose you achieve and the actual desired position or orientation.

So the best description is that repeatability is the ability to return to the same pose consistently, while accuracy is how close that pose is to the true target. If the robot lands in nearly the same place every time but that place isn’t the target, it’s highly repeatable but not very accurate. The other statements mix up these ideas, either swapping the definitions, claiming they’re the same, or conflating average error with dispersion.

Subscribe

Get the latest from Passetra

You can unsubscribe at any time. Read our privacy policy